1947: India's Independence, Partition's Pain, and the Price of Decisions

Exploring the jubilation of freedom, the tragedy of division, and the enduring insights into responsible decision-making that shaped a subcontinent.

---

The Moment Itself

On August 15, 1947, at the stroke of midnight, India awoke to freedom after nearly two centuries of British colonial rule. The air in Delhi crackled with anticipation and jubilation as Jawaharlal Nehru, India's first Prime Minister, delivered his iconic "Tryst with Destiny" speech. This moment marked a monumental milestone in the global decolonization movement, signaling the end of an empire and the birth of two new nations: India and Pakistan. The path to this freedom was paved by decades of relentless struggle, led by figures like Mahatma Gandhi, whose philosophy of non-violent civil disobedience captivated the world. However, the joy of independence was inextricably linked to a profound and tragic decision: the Partition of British India. Driven by the demands of the Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, for a separate Muslim-majority state, and the British desire for a swift exit, the hastily drawn Radcliffe Line cleaved the subcontinent along religious lines. What was at stake was not just political sovereignty, but the very fabric of society, as millions found their homes, livelihoods, and identities suddenly on the wrong side of a new, arbitrary border.

The Emotional Landscape

The emotional landscape of August 1947 was a jarring tapestry of contrasting extremes. For many, particularly in the major cities, independence brought an explosion of euphoria, a collective sigh of relief and pride after generations of subjugation. Flags waved, celebrations erupted, and a sense of boundless hope for a self-determined future permeated the air. Yet, this elation was brutally juxtaposed with an escalating tide of fear, grief, and unbridled anger in the regions directly affected by Partition. Millions of Hindus, Sikhs, and Muslims were forced to abandon ancestral homes, embarking on perilous journeys across the newly drawn borders. Trains arrived filled with corpses, and communal violence erupted on an unprecedented scale, turning neighbors into enemies. The sheer scale of displacement – estimated at 15 million people – and the accompanying bloodshed created an immediate humanitarian crisis. While public celebrations continued, a deep, collective trauma began to embed itself in the psyche of a generation, a silent sorrow that often overshadowed the declared triumph of freedom.

---

---

A Lesson in Social Emotional Learning

The events surrounding India's independence offer a poignant, albeit painful, lesson in Responsible Decision-Making. The decision to partition, while a political compromise aimed at resolving deep communal divisions, was executed with a staggering lack of foresight regarding its human consequences. Key figures, including Lord Mountbatten, the last Viceroy, pushed for an accelerated timetable, seemingly underestimating the logistical nightmare and the human cost of redrawing ancient boundaries overnight. There was a failure to adequately consider the diverse perspectives of all communities, the potential for mass displacement, and the inevitable eruption of violence that would follow. The ethical implications of prioritizing a swift political exit over the safety and well-being of millions were profound. This historical moment underscores that responsible decision-making, especially in leadership, demands not only strategic thinking but also profound empathy, a thorough assessment of potential risks, and a commitment to mitigating harm, even when faced with immense pressure and complex challenges. The echoes of Partition continue to resonate, reminding us of the enduring impact when such crucial decisions are made without full consideration of their human toll.

---

Latest Posts

Henry Hudson's Arctic Obsession: A Voyage of Discovery, Mutiny, and Unforeseen Lessons

Journey back to 1610 as explorer Henry Hudson's relentless pursuit of the Northwest Passage transforms into a gripping tale of survival, conflict, and profound insights into our emotional landscape.

---

The Moment Itself

On August 2, 1610, aboard the ship Discovery, English explorer Henry Hudson sailed into a vast, uncharted sea, convinced he had finally found the elusive Northwest Passage. His fourth voyage, funded by British merchants eager for a direct sea route to the lucrative markets of Asia, had pushed through the turbulent waters north of the Americas. What Hudson encountered was not the fabled passage to the Pacific, but an enormous inland sea, later to bear his name: Hudson Bay. For months, he meticulously charted its eastern coast, his obsession with finding the passage overriding all other concerns. The stakes were immense: untold riches for his sponsors, immortal fame for Hudson, and the collective survival of his crew in a remote, hostile environment as the arctic winter rapidly approached. His unyielding determination, born of years of failed attempts, now guided his every decision, driving Discovery deeper into the bay, unknowingly sealing his fate and that of many aboard.

The Emotional Landscape

The initial elation upon entering the vast waters of the bay must have been palpable—a mixture of hope, triumph, and perhaps a desperate relief that their arduous journey might finally yield success. Yet, as the weeks turned into months and the ice began to thicken, a profound shift occurred. Hope curdled into despair, elation into a gnawing fear. The crew, already exhausted and short on provisions, watched with growing alarm as Hudson pushed them further into the bay, disregarding their pleas to turn back. Fear of starvation, of being trapped in the unforgiving ice, and of a slow, agonizing death became their constant companion. This fear festered into deep-seated anger and frustration, directed squarely at Hudson's obstinate and increasingly irrational leadership. For Hudson, the emotional landscape was likely one of relentless pressure, a single-minded pursuit bordering on delusion, perhaps a desperate refusal to admit defeat even as the grim reality of their situation became undeniable. The chasm between the captain's vision and his crew's dire reality widened, creating an unbearable tension.

---

---

A Lesson in Social Emotional Learning

Henry Hudson's ill-fated voyage into Hudson Bay provides a stark, albeit tragic, lesson in Responsible Decision-Making and Relationship Skills. Hudson's relentless drive, while a hallmark of great explorers, became a profound failure in responsible decision-making. He exhibited a clear lack of foresight and adaptability, failing to adjust his strategy despite mounting evidence (the size of the bay, the encroaching winter) that his primary goal was unattainable. His obsession blinded him to the grave consequences for his crew and the mission's ultimate failure. He did not adequately weigh the risks against the diminishing returns.

Furthermore, the voyage highlights a catastrophic breakdown in Relationship Skills. Hudson's inability to effectively communicate with his crew, to acknowledge their valid fears, or to foster a collaborative environment proved fatal. His autocratic leadership style and perceived disregard for their well-being eroded trust and loyalty, leading directly to the desperate act of mutiny. The crew, in turn, also struggled with effective relationship skills, as their discontent escalated into rebellion rather than a negotiated resolution, albeit under extreme duress. The moment speaks to us today about the critical balance between ambition and pragmatism, the paramount importance of empathetic leadership, and the dire consequences that arise when communication fails and responsible decisions are abandoned in the face of obsessive pursuit.

---

Latest Posts

The Battle of Minden: Discipline, Miscommunication, and the Birth of a Victory

How a misinterpretation on the battlefield led to an incredible act of bravery and revealed timeless insights into human behavior under pressure.

---

The Moment Itself

On August 1, 1759, amidst the sprawling European conflict known as the Seven Years' War, a pivotal engagement unfolded near Minden in present-day Germany. Allied Anglo-German forces, commanded by Prince Ferdinand of Brunswick, faced the French army under Marshal de Contades and Duc de Broglie. The morning fog, combined with miscommunication, set the stage for an extraordinary and perhaps unintended act of bravery. An order, intended to instruct the British infantry to advance "with cavalry" (or through a gap created by it), was somehow interpreted by six British infantry regiments and two Hanoverian battalions as an order to advance directly "through" the cavalry line, into the teeth of the massed French cavalry. What followed was an act of astonishing discipline and courage. With parade-ground precision, these infantry units marched directly across the battlefield, flags flying, drums beating, ignoring repeated orders to halt from their own cavalry commander, Lord George Sackville. They met the French cavalry charges head-on, firing disciplined volleys that shattered the elite French horsemen and then pressed forward into the main French lines, routing their infantry. This audacious, almost suicidal, advance utterly broke the French center, sealing a decisive Allied victory that ensured the safety of Hanover and shifted the strategic balance in the German theater.

The Emotional Landscape

The emotional texture of Minden was a complex tapestry woven from fear, confusion, unwavering courage, and ultimately, triumphant relief. For the British and Hanoverian soldiers making that seemingly inexplicable charge, the initial sensation must have been a chilling blend of duty and disbelief as they advanced unprotected towards formidable enemy cavalry. Yet, their discipline held, transforming potential panic into a grim resolve. Their unwavering advance, a testament to extensive drilling and unit cohesion, was a collective act of courage that overcame individual fear. On the French side, the sight of infantry calmly marching into cavalry charges, and not breaking, likely induced confusion that quickly gave way to alarm and then rout. The Allied camp, witnessing this unexpected success, would have experienced a surge of hope and elation as the battle turned decisively in their favor. The cost, however, was also clear: hundreds lay dead or wounded on both sides, and the triumph was tempered by the stark reality of war's human toll. The "Minden Roses" legend, where soldiers plucked flowers from the field to adorn their caps, speaks to the emotional high of victory, a small, vibrant gesture against the backdrop of grim combat.

---

---

A Lesson in Social Emotional Learning

The Battle of Minden offers a compelling, albeit complex, lesson in Responsible Decision-Making, particularly when viewed through the lens of individual and collective action under extreme pressure. The initial advance of the British infantry was born from a fundamental miscommunication – a failure in clear instruction that could have been disastrous. Yet, the soldiers, in their disciplined adherence to what they believed was the order, made a collective "decision" to press forward. This highlights how a sense of duty and the ability to self-manage fear (components of Self-Management) can lead to profoundly impactful actions, even when based on flawed information. Their disciplined march was a testament to training and collective trust, enabling them to make the "right" decision (to obey, to advance) in a volatile, ambiguous situation, despite the immense personal risk.

Conversely, the controversy surrounding Lord George Sackville's refusal to commit his cavalry for the pursuit after the French rout demonstrates the complexities of responsible decision-making at a strategic level. His caution, though perhaps defensively rationalized, was viewed as a failure to capitalize fully on a decisive victory, leading to his court-martial. This illustrates that "responsible" actions in high-stakes environments are not always clear-cut, can be deeply influenced by individual judgment and perceived risk, and may be heavily scrutinized in hindsight.

The Battle of Minden, therefore, speaks to us today about the critical importance of clear communication, the power of collective discipline in achieving extraordinary outcomes, and the enduring challenge of making "responsible" decisions when information is incomplete, stakes are high, and the path forward is fraught with risk. It reminds us that even when intentions are good, or discipline is strong, the human element—misinterpretation, caution, courage—shapes the course of history.

---

Latest Posts

Constantine's Ascent: A Turning Point in Roman and Christian History

Explore the pivotal moment in 306 CE when Constantine's legions defied tradition, forever altering the destiny of the Roman Empire and setting the stage for a new era of power and faith.

---

The Moment Itself

On July 25, 306 CE, in the Roman military camp of Eboracum (modern-day York, England), a monumental declaration irrevocably altered the course of Roman and, eventually, Christian history. Following the unexpected death of Emperor Constantius Chlorus, his son, Constantine, was proclaimed Augustus by his loyal legions. This was not a preordained succession; rather, it was a brazen challenge to the established Tetrarchy, a system meticulously designed by Diocletian to prevent such unilateral power grabs. The Tetrarchy divided the vast Roman Empire into East and West, each ruled by a senior Augustus and a junior Caesar, with a clear line of succession intended to ensure stability. Constantius, as Western Augustus, had died before his designated successor could be elevated. Constantine, a charismatic military commander who had served with distinction under his father, seized the moment. His soldiers, bypassing the intricate political mechanisms of the Tetrarchy and fueled by devotion to their popular general, elevated him directly to the highest imperial rank. At stake was not just Constantine’s personal ambition, but the very viability of Diocletian’s carefully constructed framework for imperial governance and the peace it had largely maintained for two decades. The senior Augustus, Galerius, then residing in the East, now faced a direct usurpation, forcing a dangerous political chessboard into motion.

The Emotional Landscape

The emotional texture of this moment was a volatile mix of fervent loyalty, audacious ambition, and palpable apprehension. For Constantine’s troops, their acclamation was an outpouring of devotion and perhaps a pragmatic move to secure their own future under a strong leader. Their jubilation and defiant unity stood in stark contrast to the likely shock and anger reverberating through the imperial courts, particularly that of Galerius. For the general populace, word of such a sudden and irregular imperial ascension would have triggered a familiar unease—the specter of civil war, a recurring nightmare throughout Roman history. Hope for stability would have mingled with fear of renewed conflict. Constantine himself, while undoubtedly exhilarated by the proclamation, would have felt the immense weight of his precarious position. He had the legions' backing but lacked legitimate recognition from the senior emperor, a challenge requiring both courage and shrewd self-management to navigate the treacherous political waters ahead.

---

---

A Lesson in Social Emotional Learning

Constantine’s ascension, viewed through the lens of Social Emotional Learning, offers a profound insight into Responsible Decision-Making. Faced with an unexpected opportunity born of his father's death and his legions' loyalty, Constantine made the immediate decision to accept the imperial title. This was not a rash choice but a calculated gamble. He understood the immediate context (his legions' support, the power vacuum) and the potential consequences (war with Galerius). Instead of a full confrontation, he demonstrated remarkable strategic thinking by immediately dispatching a letter to Galerius, presenting his acclamation as a regrettable but unavoidable act forced by his troops, offering to accept the lesser title of Caesar. This nuanced appeal acknowledged the existing power structure while asserting his own burgeoning authority. His decision to temporize rather than provoke an immediate full-scale conflict, exhibiting both self-awareness of his position and social awareness of the broader imperial politics, ultimately allowed him to consolidate power and survive. This pivotal moment showcases how a complex decision, though self-serving, can be executed with a degree of responsibility, balancing ambition with strategic prudence to shape history. The moment still speaks to us today, highlighting the intricate dance between seizing opportunity and navigating power dynamics with foresight and a measure of caution.

---

Latest Posts

The Emotional Aftermath of Gettysburg: A Turning Point in the Civil War

Explore the raw realities of July 3, 1863, and how this turning point in the American Civil War offers profound insights into human resilience and decision-making.

---

The Moment Itself

On July 3, 1863, the fields outside Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, became the crucible for the American Civil War’s most pivotal clash. For two days, Union and Confederate forces had grappled in brutal, relentless fighting. Confederate General Robert E. Lee, emboldened by past victories and believing the Union line vulnerable, made a fateful decision: a direct, frontal assault on the Union center atop Cemetery Ridge. Around 1 PM, over 12,000 Confederate infantrymen, under the command of General George Pickett and others, emerged from the tree line and began their mile-long march across open fields, under scorching summer sun, directly into the concentrated fire of Union artillery and infantry. They marched with precision, their battle flags fluttering, a defiant wave against an unyielding tide. Union artillery tore vast holes in their ranks, followed by a torrent of musket fire as they approached. Despite horrific casualties, small pockets of Confederates reached the Union line, breaching it momentarily before being overwhelmed. By late afternoon, the charge had utterly collapsed, leaving thousands of dead and wounded Confederates sprawled across the fields. The attack, a desperate gamble, had failed catastrophically, marking the high-water mark of the Confederacy and cementing a Union victory that irrevocably shifted the war's momentum.

The Emotional Landscape

The emotional landscape of Gettysburg was one of profound extremes. For the Confederate soldiers, it began with a mixture of determined resolve and grim fatalism, fueled by loyalty to their cause and commanders. As they advanced into the maelstrom, courage morphed into raw terror, then despair, as their ranks disintegrated under fire. The silence that followed the repulse was filled not with triumph for the living, but with the groans of the dying and the dazed shock of those who had survived. Grief was palpable for comrades lost, and a collective sense of crushing failure descended. On the Union side, the initial fear and tension of waiting for the charge gave way to a surge of adrenaline as they held their ground, followed by immense relief and exhaustion. Yet, even in victory, the sight of the mangled battlefield, littered with thousands of men from both sides, brought a sobering wave of sorrow and weariness. The local civilians, who had huddled in cellars listening to the cacophony of battle, emerged to a landscape transformed into an unimaginable charnel house, grappling with the trauma of bearing witness and the immense task of tending to a staggering number of wounded.

---

---

A Lesson in Social Emotional Learning

The Battle of Gettysburg provides stark insights into Responsible Decision-Making and Self-Management. General Lee's decision to order Pickett's Charge, while bold, stands as a contentious example of decision-making under extreme pressure. It suggests a potential failure in responsible decision-making, where an overreliance on past success and an underestimation of the adversary’s strength led to a gamble with catastrophic human cost. The decision prioritized a direct, decisive blow over a comprehensive assessment of tactical feasibility and the immense risks to his troops, highlighting how even seasoned leaders can miscalculate when driven by desperation or overconfidence. Conversely, the individual soldiers on both sides exemplified profound Self-Management. Facing unimaginable terror, the ability of these men to control their fear, maintain formation (for the charging Confederates), and unleash devastating firepower (for the defending Union troops) speaks to an extraordinary capacity for emotional regulation and grit in the face of imminent death. This moment reminds us that while strategic decisions shape outcomes, the personal resolve and resilience of individuals can define the texture of historical events. The enduring legacy of Gettysburg still speaks to us today, not just of a turning point in war, but of the complex interplay between leadership, human endurance, and the profound consequences of choices made in moments of crisis.

---

Latest Posts

The Embargo Act: A Case Study in Social-Emotional Learning

The Embargo Act: More Than Just a Historical Event

The Embargo Act, signed into law on December 22, 1807, was a pivotal moment in the early history of the United States. This act, which aimed to restrict American trade with foreign nations, was a response to the ongoing conflict between Britain and France, known as the Napoleonic Wars.

The Act's origins can be traced back to the British and French practice of seizing American ships and impressing their sailors into their respective navies. These acts of aggression violated American neutrality and led to growing tensions between the United States and both European powers. In an effort to avoid further conflict, President Thomas Jefferson and his administration sought a diplomatic solution. However, when negotiations with Britain and France failed to produce satisfactory results, the Embargo Act was seen as the only viable option.

The Embargo Act, which was passed by Congress with overwhelming bipartisan support, prohibited American ships from sailing to foreign ports. It also banned the importation of goods from foreign countries. The primary goal of the Act was to pressure Britain and France to respect American neutrality and cease their practice of impressment.

The Embargo Act had a significant impact on the American economy. With the closure of foreign markets, American merchants and farmers suffered significant losses. The Act also led to a decline in shipping activity, which had been a major source of income for many Americans. In response to the economic hardship caused by the Embargo Act, many Americans began to focus on domestic manufacturing and economic education.

The Embargo Act also had a political impact. Opposition to the Act grew within the Democratic-Republican Party, leading to the formation of a new faction known as the War Hawks. The War Hawks advocated for a more aggressive foreign policy and eventually succeeded in persuading Congress to declare war on Britain in 1812.

The Embargo Act was eventually repealed in 1809, after it became clear that it had failed to achieve its intended goals. However, the Act had a lasting impact on the American economy and society. It encouraged the development of domestic manufacturing and led to increased focus on economic education. The Embargo Act also helped to solidify American nationalism and prepare the country for its role as a major world power.

---

Featured Courses

---

The Case for Social Emotional Learning

The Embargo Act offers a compelling historical example that can support the case for social-emotional learning (SEL) in online programs like "Identity, Expression, and Desire" at Self Exploration Academy.

Here's how the Embargo Act relates to SEL:

1. Adaptability and Resilience: The Embargo Act forced Americans to adapt to a sudden and significant change in their economic circumstances. This historical event demonstrates the importance of developing resilience and adaptability in the face of adversity, skills that are crucial for SEL.

2. Empathy and Understanding: The Embargo Act likely led to increased empathy and understanding among Americans as they faced shared hardships. This experience highlights the value of cultivating empathy and understanding in interpersonal relationships, which are essential components of SEL.

3. Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving: In response to the economic challenges posed by the Embargo Act, many Americans turned to domestic manufacturing and economic education. This demonstrates the importance of developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills, which are key aspects of SEL.

4. Communication and Collaboration: The Embargo Act likely required increased communication and collaboration among Americans as they worked together to address the economic crisis. This highlights the value of developing effective communication and collaboration skills, which are essential for building strong relationships and achieving common goals.

In conclusion, the Embargo Act offers a historical example of the importance of developing social-emotional skills in the face of adversity. By incorporating SEL into online programs like "Identity, Expression, and Desire," Self Exploration Academy can help students develop the skills they need to navigate the challenges of life and build strong, fulfilling relationships.

Exploring D-Day Through the Lens of Social-Emotional Learning (SEL)

Uncovering Empathy, Teamwork, and Leadership Through History

D-Day, on June 6, 1944, was a pivotal moment in World War II. Here's a breakdown of the details and its lasting impact:

Details of D-Day:

• Codenamed Operation Overlord: A massive amphibious assault by Allied forces (American, British, Canadian) on the heavily fortified coast of Normandy, France.

• Scale: Over 156,000 troops landed on five beaches facing fierce German resistance.expand_more

• Significance: Though not the war's end (which came 11 months later), D-Day marked a crucial turning point, opening a second major front in Europe against Nazi Germany.

Impact on History and Military Education:

• Highlighting Allied Collaboration: D-Day showcased the successful cooperation between nations with different military doctrines and strategies. This emphasised the importance of alliances and combined arms tactics.

• Logistics and Planning: The meticulous planning and logistical feat of D-Day are studied for their complexity and innovation in amphibious warfare. Military education analyses the use of deception, intelligence gathering, and technological advancements that contributed to the invasion's success.

• The Human Cost of War: D-Day serves as a stark reminder of the immense human cost of war.  The sacrifices made by soldiers on both sides are studied to understand the gravity of military decisions.

• Technological Advancements: New weaponry, communication tools, and specialised vehicles used on D-Day inform military education on how technological innovation shapes warfare.

• The Importance of Leadership: The courageous leadership displayed by Allied commanders is analysed for its effectiveness in motivating troops and achieving objectives under immense pressure.

D-Day's legacy goes beyond military tactics. It's a symbol of international cooperation, sacrifice, and the fight for freedom. Studying D-Day allows us to understand the complexities of war and the importance of international collaboration in maintaining peace.

---

Featured Courses

---

The Case for Social Emotional Learning

The story of D-Day connects to social-emotional learning (SEL) in online programs like "Identity, Expression and Desire" at Self Exploration Academy in a few ways:

• Understanding Sacrifice and Empathy: D-Day highlights the immense sacrifices made by soldiers. SEL programs can help students develop empathy by exploring the human cost of war and the emotions soldiers might have experienced.

• Collaboration and Communication: The success of D-Day relied heavily on Allied collaboration. SEL programs can teach students communication skills and teamwork, crucial for effective collaboration – just like the Allied forces needed.

• Leadership and Decision-Making: D-Day showcased strong leadership by Allied commanders. SEL programs can help students develop leadership skills, critical thinking, and decision-making abilities in complex situations.

• Identity and Expression: The "Identity, Expression and Desire" program title suggests it focuses on personal exploration. D-Day soldiers faced situations that challenged their identities and forced them to express courage and resilience.  This historical event can be a springboard for discussions on personal identity development in challenging circumstances.

By exploring historical events like D-Day, online SEL programs can provide a real-world context for students to develop social and emotional skills. They can see how these skills were crucial for success, even in a historical event far removed from their daily lives.

Furthermore, D-Day can be a jumping-off point for broader discussions on topics like:

• The Impact of War on Individuals and Societies: This connects to empathy and understanding the human cost of conflict.

• Responsibility and Citizenship: Students can explore the concept of fighting for a greater good and the responsibilities that come with citizenship.

• Overcoming Challenges: D-Day exemplifies overcoming seemingly insurmountable odds. This can inspire students to develop perseverance and coping skills.

D-Day becomes more than a historical fact; it becomes a case study for social-emotional learning.

---

Related Posts

Ketanji Brown Jackson Introduces Herself as A Force to Be Reckoned With

Insights from her first week as a Supreme Court Justice position Jackson as a powerful player in the Judicial Branch of the United States.

SCOTUS Significance

Today’s post is all about the powerful entry of one Ketanji Brown Jackson as the newest Supreme Court Justice. For that reason, we are going to pause for a moment to provide context in case any of our readers are unfamiliar with the Supreme Court of the United States, or why it is such a “big deal” to many people throughout the country and around the world.

The Supreme Court, established on September 24, 1789 is the “the highest court in the land and the only part of the federal judiciary (the judicial authorities of a country) specifically required by the Constitution.” (The White House) At present, there are nine Supreme Court Justices, including John G. Roberts Jr. (Chief Justice of the United States), Clarence Thomas (Associate Justice), Samuel A. Alito Jr. (Associate Justice), Sonia Sotomayor (Associate Justice), Elena Kagan (Associate Justice), Neil M. Gorsuch (Associate Justice), Brett M. Kavanaugh (Associate Justice), Amy Coney Barrett (Associate Justice), and Ketanji Brown Jackson (Associate Justice).

In order to become a Supreme Court Justice, you must be appointed by the President of the United States, and confirmed by Congress. Supreme Court Justices are granted a life term, and are expected to serve until they die, retire, or find themselves impeached and convicted.

Merrill vs. Milligan//Voting Rights

Just last week, the Supreme Court took a moment to hear the Merrill vs. Milligan case, which narrows its focus on “how much those who draw electoral districts should be required to consider race.” (The Guardian) 

During the hearing, the solicitor general for Alabama, Edmund LaCour argued that the layout of his state’s congressional map was not in discrimination against voting citizens who are Black. And when the plaintiffs of the case illustrated the feasibility of redrawing the map to include two majority-Black districts instead of one, LaCour insisted that doing so would require the mapmaker to go to dramatic lengths to consider race – which he believed to be at conflict with the provision of the 14th amendment of the US Constitution.

In response to LaCour’s argument, Ketanji Brown Jackson took about five minutes to refocus the court’s understanding of the 14th amendment, which was created to protect each citizen’s right to fair treatment under the law, regardless of the colour of their skin. An article published to The Guardian captured the perspective of court observers on this interaction:

““I think it’s really clear she’s just going to be a force to be reckoned with,” said Leah Litman, a law professor at the University of Michigan. “Both in questioning positions that she’s skeptical of, but also in providing support for lawyers when they’re being subject to hostile questioning.”” (The Guardian)

“I don’t think that the historical record establishes that the founders believed race neutrality or race blindness was required,” said Jackson, in response to LaCour. “It was drafted to give a foundational, a constitutional foundation for a piece of legislation that was designed to make people who had less opportunity and less rights equal to white citizens… I’m trying to understand why that violates the 14th amendment given the history and background of the 14th amendment.”

Universal Core Competencies on Display

Our takeaways from what we’ve seen and read in the last week as Ketanji Brown Jackson has officially taken her seat and gotten to work as the newest Associate Justice for the Supreme Court of the United States are many. Still, we are compelled to examine the resolve and the authority displayed by Jackson in her response to the solicitor general. Here are three universal core competencies we saw on display from the Associate Justice, accompanied by their definitions.

Respect for Policies

One's capacity for honouring an established set of rules and guidelines, especially in a professional, academic, religious or governmental setting.

Jackson’s response was one that brought attention to the 14th amendment, which was pushed in LaCour’s argument as being dismissed at the notion of restructuring Alabama’s congressional map in the way that was illustrated by the plaintiffs in the Merrill vs. Milligan case. She focused on bringing attention to the context and the intention of the amendment, which was introduced in the 19th century.

Traditional/Regulatory Drive

One's capacity for feeling and adhering to a compulsion to achieve or accomplish something related to principle.

Again, Jackson’s response illustrated that she is focused on honouring the principle of the laws and the US Constitution. Inasmuch, her aim to find clarity in LaCour’s argument was presented through this lens.

Balanced Decision Making

One's capacity for objectively evaluating available options against desired objectives and potential outcomes, and selecting a course of action with confidence and resolve.

During the course of the hearing of this case, there were many notes and perspectives introduced and addressed. In the moments where Justice Jackson chose to speak, she was very intentional with the direction she chose, carefully considering the desired outcome of what she was presented to work with.

Who is someone who has inspired you recently? What was it that they said or did that you found encouraging or otherwise noteworthy? What are some of the universal core competencies that they displayed with their words or actions? Hopefully you can continue to identify the north stars in your everyday life, and use them to propel you towards your purpose, your passions and your dreams.

Until next time…

---

Featured Courses

---

Related Posts

How to Be A Leader

---

Have you ever wondered what it means to be a leader? Have you ever thought of yourself as more of a leader or a follower? Do you feel like you sometimes struggle with taking initiative? Well, by now you probably know the deal. If you answered yes to any of these questions, then this post was made for you.

---

What is a leader?

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, a leader is “the person who leads or commands a group, organisation, or country.”

There are many different kinds of leaders in the world today. From religious leaders and government officials, to bloggers and social media influencers. 

Oftentimes, we look to the number of followers a person has in order to determine how great of a leader they actually are — this sometimes leads to feelings of inadequacy though, if we’re not careful. You see, one of the challenges we often see in people who desire to be a leader is that they look at leadership more as a position that you are put into by someone else rather than a posture that you put yourself into. Today we will look at what it looks like to be a leader, with or without external validation from others.

Practice Accurate Self-Assessment

Self Assessment is defined as “one's capacity for observing, understanding and accurately judging the quality of one's own skills and abilities based on their performance.” (The Academic Glossary)

In order to be a leader, it is important to understand your strengths and weaknesses, or the areas in which you still need improvement. Maybe you are a strong vocalist who is really good at creating musical content when collaborating with a stronger lyricist. Or maybe you’re really good at both. Knowing your strengths will help you build leadership skills, and knowing your weaknesses will help you identify the areas where you need help in order to be the best leader you can possibly be.

Commit to Serving Others

Another important note about being a good leader is this: leadership = service.

In order to lead others, you must be willing to serve them. For example, your service as a stellar vocalist may be to entertain your fans with new content, or to educate your clients or students through your skill. A community leader may serve their community by representing their voices on a larger platform in order to help create a desired or otherwise necessary change. Your leadership may look different depending on your skills and passions, however, it will always include acts of service towards the very people you lead. Which brings us to our next and final note… following through.

Follow Through

In an article published to Medium.com back in 2020, blogger Tullio Siragusa argued that the significance of follow through could “never be emphasized enough.” In expansion:

“Living up to your commitments is helps you earn credibility. It is something people notice immediately about you. If you mean what you say and do what you committed to doing, you will earn trust and respect from people.

On the other hand, if you don’t follow-through on your words, people will soon stop caring about what you have to say. For leaders, this behavior can translate into utter disappointment for the employees, and disengagement.” – Tullio Siragusa

Good leadership requires follow through, and while there may be no one-size-fits-all approach to leading a life well lived, it is certainly important that each of us strives to do what we say we will do, and work on improving our consistency and reliability.

So take what you’ve learned today, and see how it changes your life. Practice accurate self-assessment, commit to serving others, and always follow through.

Why sink when you can SWIM?

---

Related Courses