The Day Women Won the Vote: A Century After Suffrage
A look back at the dramatic final days of the suffrage movement, the courageous decisions, and the enduring legacy of the 19th Amendment.
On August 26, 1920, a seemingly bureaucratic act in Washington, D.C., marked the culmination of a seventy-two-year struggle, forever altering the landscape of American democracy. Secretary of State Bainbridge Colby, without ceremony, signed the proclamation certifying the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, formally granting women the right to vote. This quiet moment belied the ferocious, decades-long battle that preceded it, a fight waged by generations of women and their allies against entrenched societal norms, political opposition, and often violent resistance. The stakes were nothing less than the full citizenship of half the nation's population, challenging fundamental ideas about gender roles, power, and who truly belonged in the public sphere.
The Moment Itself
The amendment's journey to certification hinged on ratification by 36 states. By the summer of 1920, 35 had approved, leaving Tennessee as the final, crucial battleground. Nashville became a vortex of intense lobbying, with "Suffs" (suffragists) in their yellow roses and "Antis" (anti-suffragists) in their red roses clashing openly. The fate of the amendment rested on a single vote in the Tennessee House of Representatives. On August 18, 1920, the vote was deadlocked. Then, a young legislator named Harry Burn, at 24 the youngest member of the House, received a letter from his mother, Phoebe Ensminger Burn. "Dear Son," she wrote, "Hurrah and vote for suffrage and don't forget to be a good boy." Despite wearing a red rose, signifying his anti-suffrage stance, and facing immense pressure from his party, Burn changed his vote from "no" to "aye," breaking the tie and securing ratification by a single vote. His courageous decision, influenced by his mother's plea, sent shockwaves through the chamber and across the nation, paving the way for Colby's signature eight days later.
The Emotional Landscape
The emotional landscape surrounding the 19th Amendment's certification was a tempest of hope, despair, and ultimately, exultation. For suffragists like Carrie Chapman Catt and Alice Paul, the decades had been marked by relentless activism, public ridicule, arrests, hunger strikes, and the heartbreak of repeated legislative defeats. Their hope was a fragile, yet unyielding flame, fueled by a deep conviction in justice. The final days in Tennessee were fraught with anxiety, a culmination of years of sacrifice hanging by a thread. When Harry Burn cast his decisive vote, the immediate reaction was a mixture of stunned silence, then shouts, tears, and spontaneous celebrations among the suffragists. For the "Antis," the emotion was one of profound anger and betrayal, a sense of a world irrevocably altered and, in their view, diminished. This moment encapsulated the raw human experience of a societal paradigm shift: the joy of hard-won victory for some, and the bitter resentment of perceived loss for others.
A Lesson in Social Emotional Learning
The struggle for the 19th Amendment offers profound insights into Social Awareness and Responsible Decision-Making. The suffragists demonstrated extraordinary social awareness by recognizing and articulating the systemic injustice of women's disenfranchisement. They understood the broader societal implications of denying half the population a voice, empathizing with the collective struggle for equality. Their persistent advocacy was rooted in this deep understanding of societal structures and the need for change. Harry Burn's pivotal vote exemplifies responsible decision-making. Faced with intense political pressure and the expectation to vote a certain way, he chose to listen to his conscience and his mother's moral guidance, prioritizing a principle he believed was right over political expediency. His decision, while personally challenging, ultimately served a greater good. The moment still speaks to us today, reminding us that progress often requires individuals to cultivate a deep social awareness of inequities and to make courageous, responsible decisions that challenge the status quo, even when it's unpopular.
